Impact on Resources & Quality

False positive blood cultures can increase unnecessary treatment, resource utilization, and operational burden.

Conserve
laboratory
resources
Improve patient
throughput
Limit needless
investigation &
reporting
Help reduce
unnecessary
ID consults
Reduce
supply waste

Supporting Evidence

Accurate HOB & CLABSI Reporting
Blood culture contamination may affect quality metric reporting, antibiotic stewardship efforts, and downstream resource utilization.
With an estimated 1.2 million BCCs in the U.S. annually, the negative impact on hospitals is substantial.

1.0 to 5.4 days

Increase in length of stay (LOS) per false positive result limits available beds.28

Up to 70.6%

of patients with a false positive undergo repeat blood draws.58

~7 days

Increased use of unnecessary antibiotics with blood culture contaminations.14

The Kurin Experience

Review Kurin Studies

Testimonial

The use of the [Kurin] could potentially save our institution 187– 343 hospital-days annually and be an important addition to ongoing practices to minimize BCCs. 

UMass Memorial Health, Worcester, MA21

Better Cultures, Better Outcomes

Save Money

False positive blood cultures begin a cascade of unnecessary treatment that may impact the financial bottom line.

Save Lives

Reducing contamination may help improve diagnostic accuracy and prevent unnecessary treatment, thereby lowering patient risk.